Paper detail

Clouds in the atmospheres of extrasolar planets. III. Impact of low and high-level clouds on the reflection spectra of Earth-like planets

We study the influence of low-level water and high-level ice clouds on low-resolution reflection spectra and planetary albedos of Earth-like planets orbiting different types of stars in both the visible and near infrared wavelength range. We use a one-dimensional radiative-convective steady-state atmospheric model coupled with a parametric cloud model, based on observations in the Earth's atmosphere to study the effect of both cloud types on the reflection spectra and albedos of Earth-like extrasolar planets at low resolution for various types of central stars. We find that the high scattering efficiency of clouds substantially causes both the amount of reflected light and the related depths of the absorption bands to be substantially larger than in comparison to the respective clear sky conditions. Low-level clouds have a stronger impact on the spectra than the high-level clouds because of their much larger scattering optical depth. The detectability of molecular features in near the UV - near IR wavelength range is strongly enhanced by the presence of clouds. However, the detectability of various chemical species in low-resolution reflection spectra depends strongly on the spectral energy distribution of the incident stellar radiation. In contrast to the reflection spectra the spectral planetary albedos enable molecular features to be detected without a direct influence of the spectral energy distribution of the stellar radiation. Here, clouds increase the contrast between the radiation fluxes of the planets and the respective central star by about one order of magnitude, but the resulting contrast values are still too low to be observable with the current generation of telescopes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.