Paper detail

CloudCast: Characterizing Public Clouds Connectivity

Public clouds are one of the most thriving technologies of the past decade. Major applications over public clouds require world-wide distribution and large amounts of data exchange between their distributed servers. To that end, major cloud providers have invested tens of billions of dollars in building world-wide inter-region networking infrastructure that can support high performance communication into, out of, and across public cloud geographic regions. In this paper, we lay the foundation for a comprehensive study and real time monitoring of various characteristic of networking within and between public clouds. We start by presenting CloudCast, a world-wide and expandable measurements and analysis system, currently (January 2019)collecting data from three major public clouds (AWS, GCPand Azure), 59 regions, 1184 intra-cloud and 2238 cross-cloud links (each link represents a direct connection between a pair of regions), amounting to a total of 3422 continuously monitored links and providing active measurements every minute.CloudCast is composed of measurement agents automatically installed in each public cloud region, centralized control, measurement data base, analysis engine and visualization tools. Then we turn to analyze the latency measurement data collected over almost a year . Our analysis yields surprising results. First, each public cloud exhibits a unique set of link latency behaviors along time. Second, using a novel, fair evaluation methodology, termed similar links, we compare the three clouds. Third, we prove that more than 50% of all links do not provide the optimal RTT through the methodology of triangles. Triangles also provide a framework to get around bottlenecks, benefiting not only the majority (53%-70%) of the cross-cloud links by 30% to 70%, but also a significant portion (29%-45%) of intra-cloud links by 14%-33%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.