Paper detail

Cloud Properties and Correlations with Star Formation in Numerical Simulations of the Three-Phase ISM

We apply gravity-based and density-based methods to identify clouds in numerical simulations of the star-forming, three-phase interstellar medium (ISM), and compare their properties and their global correlation with the star formation rate over time. The gravity-based method identifies bound objects, which have masses M ~ 10^3 - 10^4 M_solar at densities n_H ~ 100 cm^-3, and traditional virial parameters alpha_v ~ 0.5 - 5. For clouds defined by a density threshold n_H,min , the average virial parameter decreases, and the fraction of material that is genuinely bound increases, at higher n_H,min. Surprisingly, these clouds can be unbound even when alpha_v < 2, and high mass clouds (10^4 - 10^6 M_solar) are generally unbound. This suggests that the traditional alpha_v is at best an approximate measure of boundedness in the ISM. All clouds have internal turbulent motions increasing with size as sigma ~ 1 km/s(R/ pc)^1/2, similar to observed relations. Bound structures comprise a small fraction of the total simulation mass, with star formation efficiency per free-fall time epsilon_ff ~ 0.4. For n_H,min = 10 - 100 cm^-3, epsilon_ff ~ 0.03 - 0.3, increasing with density. Temporal correlation analysis between SFR(t) and aggregate mass M(n_H,min;t) at varying n_H,min shows that time delays to star formation are t_delay ~ t_ff(n_H,min). Correlation between SFR(t) and M(nH,min;t) systematically tightens at higher n_H,min. Considering moderate-density gas, selecting against high virial parameter clouds improves correlation with SFR, consistent with previous work. Even at high n_H,min, the temporal dispersion in (SFR-epsilon_ff M/t_ff )/<SFR> is ~ 50%, due to the large-amplitude variations and inherent stochasticity of the system.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.