Paper detail

Cloud formation in colliding flows: influence of the choice of cooling function

We study the influence of the choice of cooling function on the formation of molecular clouds in high-resolution three-dimensional simulations of converging flows. We directly compare the results obtained using the simple, parametrized cooling function introduced by Koyama & Inutsuka (2002) and used by a number of converging flow studies with the results of the detailed calculation of the non-equilibrium chemistry and thermal balance of the gas. We find that a number of the cloud properties, such as the mass and volume filling fractions of cold gas, are relatively insensitive to the choice of cooling function. On the other hand, the cloud morphology and the large-scale velocity distribution of the gas do strongly depend on the cooling function. We show that the differences that we see can largely be explained by differences in the way that Lyman-alpha cooling is treated in the two complementary approaches, and that a proper non-equilibrium treatment of the ionisation and recombination of the gas is necessary in order to model the high-temperature cooling correctly. We also investigate the properties of the dense clumps formed within the cloud. In agreement with previous models, we find that the majority of these clumps are not self-gravitating, suggesting that some form of large-scale collapse of the cloud may be required in order to produce gravitationally unstable clumps and hence stars. Overall, the physical properties of the dense clumps are similar in both simulations, suggesting that they do not depend strongly on the choice of cooling function. However, we do find a systematic difference of around 10K in the mean temperatures of the clumps produced by the two models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.