Paper detail

Clipping the Cosmos II: Cosmological information from non-linear scales

We present a method for suppressing contributions from higher-order terms in perturbation theory, greatly increasing the amount of information which may be extracted from the matter power spectrum. In an evolved cosmological density field the highest density regions are responsible for the bulk of the nonlinear power. By suitably down-weighting these problematic regions we find that the one- and two-loop terms are typically reduced in amplitude by ~70 per cent and ~95 per cent respectively, relative to the linear power spectrum. This greatly facilitates modelling the shape of the galaxy power spectrum, potentially increasing the number of useful Fourier modes by more than two orders of magnitude. We provide a demonstration of how this technique allows the galaxy bias and the amplitude of linear matter perturbations sigma_8 to be determined from the power spectrum on conventionally nonlinear scales, 0.1<k<0.7 h/Mpc.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.