Paper detail

Clinical connectivity map for drug repurposing: using laboratory tests to bridge drugs and diseases

Drug repurposing has attracted increasing attention from both the pharmaceutical industry and the research community. Many existing computational drug repurposing methods rely on preclinical data (e.g., chemical structures, drug targets), resulting in translational problems for clinical trials. In this study, we propose a clinical connectivity map framework for drug repurposing by leveraging laboratory tests to analyze complementarity between drugs and diseases. We establish clinical drug effect vectors (i.e., drug-laboratory test associations) by applying a continuous self-controlled case series model on a longitudinal electronic health record data. We establish clinical disease sign vectors (i.e., disease-laboratory test associations) by applying a Wilcoxon rank sum test on a large-scale national survey data. Finally, we compute a repurposing possibility score for each drug-disease pair by applying a dot product-based scoring function on clinical disease sign vectors and clinical drug effect vectors. We comprehensively evaluate 392 drugs for 6 important chronic diseases (e.g., asthma, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, etc.). We discover not only known associations between diseases and drugs but also many hidden drug-disease associations. Moreover, we are able to explain the predicted drug-disease associations via the corresponding complementarity between laboratory tests of drug effect vectors and disease sign vectors. The proposed clinical connectivity map framework uses laboratory tests from electronic clinical information to bridge drugs and diseases, which is explainable and has better translational power than existing computational methods. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework and suggest that our method could help identify drug repurposing opportunities, which will benefit patients by offering more effective and safer treatments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.