Paper detail

Client-Waiter games on complete and random graphs

For a graph G, a monotone increasing graph property P and positive integer q, we define the Client-Waiter game to be a two-player game which runs as follows. In each turn Waiter is offering Client a subset of at least one and at most q+1 unclaimed edges of G from which Client claims one, and the rest are claimed by Waiter. The game ends when all the edges have been claimed. If Client's graph has property P by the end of the game, then he wins the game, otherwise Waiter is the winner. In this paper we study several Client-Waiter games on the edge set of the complete graph, and the H-game on the edge set of the random graph. For the complete graph we consider games where Client tries to build a large star, a long path and a large connected component. We obtain lower and upper bounds on the critical bias for these games and compare them with the corresponding Waiter-Client games and with the probabilistic intuition. For the H-game on the random graph we show that the known results for the corresponding Maker-Breaker game are essentially the same for the Client-Waiter game, and we extend those results for the biased games and for trees.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.