Paper detail

CLEAR II: Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift

The origin of the correlations between mass, morphology, quenched fraction, and formation history in galaxies is difficult to define, primarily due to the uncertainties in galaxy star-formation histories. Star-formation histories are better constrained for higher redshift galaxies, observed closer to their formation and quenching epochs. Here we use "non-parametric" star-formation histories and a nested sampling method to derive constraints on the formation and quenching timescales of quiescent galaxies at $0.7<z<2.5$. We model deep HST grism spectroscopy and photometry from the CLEAR (CANDELS Lyman$-α$ Emission at Reionization) survey. The galaxy formation redshifts, $z_{50}$ (defined as the point where they had formed 50\% of their stellar mass) range from $z_{50}\sim 2$ (shortly prior to the observed epoch) up to $z_{50} \simeq 5-8$. \editone{We find that early formation redshifts are correlated with high stellar-mass surface densities, $\log Σ_1 / (M_\odot\ \mathrm{kpc}^{-2}) >$10.25, where $Σ_1$ is the stellar mass within 1~pkpc (proper kpc). Quiescent galaxies with the highest stellar-mass surface density, $\logΣ_1 / (M_\odot\ \mathrm{kpc}^{-2}) > 10.25$, } show a \textit{minimum} formation redshift: all such objects in our sample have $z_{50} > 2.9$. Quiescent galaxies with lower surface density, $\log Σ_1 / (M_\odot\ \mathrm{kpc}^{-2}) = 9.5 - 10.25$, show a range of formation epochs ($z_{50} \simeq 1.5 - 8$), implying these galaxies experienced a range of formation and assembly histories. We argue that the surface density threshold $\logΣ_1/(M_\odot\ \mathrm{kpc}^{-2})>10.25$ uniquely identifies galaxies that formed in the first few Gyr after the Big Bang, and we discuss the implications this has for galaxy formation models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.