Paper detail

Classifying galaxies according to their HI content

We use machine learning to classify galaxies according to their HI content, based on both their optical photometry and environmental properties. The data used for our analyses are the outputs in the range $z = 0-1$ from MUFASA cosmological hydrodynamic simulation. In our previous paper, where we predicted the galaxy HI content using the same input features, HI rich galaxies were only selected for the training. In order for the predictions on real observation data to be more accurate, the classifiers built in this study will first establish if a galaxy is HI rich ($\rm{log(M_{HI}/M_{*})} > -2 $) before estimating its neutral hydrogen content using the regressors developed in the first paper. We resort to various machine learning algorithms and assess their performance with various metrics such as accuracy for instance. The performance of the classifiers gets better with increasing redshift and reaches their peak performance around $z = 1$. Random Forest method, the most robust among the classifiers when considering only the mock data for both training and test in this study, reaches an accuracy above $98.6 \%$ at $z = 0$ and above $99.0 \%$ at $z = 1$. We test our algorithms, trained with simulation data, on classification of the galaxies in RESOLVE, ALFALFA and GASS surveys. Interestingly, SVM algorithm, the best classifier for the tests, achieves a precision, the relevant metric for the tests, above $87.60\%$ and a specificity above $71.4\%$ with all the tests, indicating that the classifier is capable of learning from the simulated data to classify HI rich/HI poor galaxies from the real observation data. With the advent of large HI 21 cm surveys such as the SKA, this set of classifiers, together with the regressors developed in the first paper, will be part of a pipeline, a very useful tool, which is aimed at predicting HI content of galaxies.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.