Paper detail

Classification of X-ray Sources in the XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source Catalog

We carry out classification of 4330 X-ray sources in the 2XMMi-DR3 catalog. They are selected under the requirement of being a point source with multiple XMM-Newton observations and at least one detection with the signal-to-noise ratio larger than 20. For about one third of them we are able to obtain reliable source types from the literature. They mostly correspond to various types of stars (611), active galactic nuclei (AGN, 753) and compact object systems (138) containing white dwarfs, neutron stars, and stellar-mass black holes. We find that about 99% of stars can be separated from other source types based on their low X-ray-to-IR flux ratios and frequent X-ray flares. AGN have remarkably similar X-ray spectra, with the power-law photon index centered around 1.91+-0.31, and their 0.2-4.5 keV flux long-term variation factors have a median of 1.48 and 98.5% less than 10. In contrast, 70% of compact object systems can be very soft or hard, highly variable in X-rays, and/or have very large X-ray-to-IR flux ratios, separating them from AGN. Using these results, we derive a source type classification scheme to classify the other sources and find 644 candidate stars, 1376 candidate AGN and 202 candidate compact object systems, whose false identification probabilities are estimated to be about 1%, 3% and 18%, respectively. There are still 320 associated with nearby galaxies and 151 in the Galactic plane, which we expect to be mostly compact object systems or background AGN. We also have 100 candidate ultra-luminous X-ray sources. They are found to be much less variable than other accreting compact objects.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.