Paper detail

Classification of Research Citations (CRC)

Research is a continuous phenomenon. It is recursive in nature. Every research is based on some earlier research outcome. A general approach in reviewing the literature for a problem is to categorize earlier work for the same problem as positive and negative citations. In this paper, we propose a novel automated technique, which classifies whether an earlier work is cited as sentiment positive or sentiment negative. Our approach first extracted the portion of the cited text from citing paper. Using a sentiment lexicon we classify the citation as positive or negative by picking a window of at most five (5) sentences around the cited place (corpus). We have used Naïve-Bayes Classifier for sentiment analysis. The algorithm is evaluated on a manually annotated and class labelled collection of 150 research papers from the domain of computer science. Our preliminary results show an accuracy of 80%. We assert that our approach can be generalized to classification of scientific research papers in different disciplines.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.