Paper detail

Classification by Boosting Differences in Input Vectors: An application to datasets from Astronomy

There are many occasions when one does not have complete information in order to classify objects into different classes, and yet it is important to do the best one can since other decisions depend on that. In astronomy, especially time-domain astronomy, this situation is common when a transient is detected and one wishes to determine what it is in order to decide if one must follow it. We propose to use the Difference Boosting Neural Network (DBNN) which can boost differences between feature vectors of different objects in order to differentiate between them. We apply it to the publicly available data of the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS) and present preliminary results. We also describe another use with a stellar spectral library to identify spectra based on a few features. The technique itself is more general and can be applied to a varied class of problems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.