Paper detail

Classification and environmental properties of X-ray selected point-like sources in the XMM-LSS field

The XMM-Large Scale Structure survey, covering an area of 11.1 sq. deg., contains more than 6000 X-ray point-like sources detected with XMM-Newton down to a flux of 3x10^-15 erg s^-1 cm^-2 in the [0.5-2] keV band, the vast majority of which have optical (CFHTLS), infrared (SWIRE), near-infrared (UKIDSS) and/or ultraviolet (GALEX) counterparts. We wish to investigate the environmental properties of the different types of the XMM-LSS X-ray sources, defining their environment using the i-band CFHTLS W1 catalog of optical galaxies down to a magnitude limit of 23.5 mag. We have classified 4435 X-ray selected sources on the basis of their spectra, SEDs and X-ray luminosity and estimated their photometric redshifts, having 4-11 band photometry, with an accuracy sigma=0.076 and 22.6% outliers for i<26 mag. We estimated the local overdensities of 777 X-ray sources which have spectro-z or photo-z calculated using more than 7 bands (accuracy sigma=0.061 with 13.8% outliers) within the volume-limited region defined by 0.1<z<0.85 and -23.5<Mi<-20. Although X-ray sources may be found in variety of environments, a large fraction (~55-60%), as verified by comparing with the random expectations, reside in overdense regions. The galaxy overdensities within which X-ray sources reside show a positive recent redshift evolution. We also find that X-ray selected galaxies, with respect to AGN, inhabit significantly higher galaxy overdensities, although their spatial extent appear to be smaller than that of AGN. Hard AGN (HR>=-0.2) are located in more overdense regions with respect to the Soft AGN (HR<-0.2), a fact clearly seen in both redshift ranges, although it appears to be stronger in the higher redshift range (0.55<z<0.85). Furthermore, the galaxy overdensities (with d>1.5) within which Soft AGN are embedded appear to evolve more rapidly with respect to the corresponding overdensities around Hard AGN.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.