Paper detail

Classical-trajectory Monte Carlo calculations of differential electron emission in fast heavy-ion collisions with water molecules

A classical description of electron emission differential ionization cross sections for highly-charged high-velocity ions ($\sim$ 10 a.u.) impinging on water molecules is presented. We investigate the validity of the classical statistical mechanics description of ionization ($\hbar=0$ limit of quantum mechanics) in different ranges of electron emission energy and solid angle, where mechanisms such as soft and binary collisions are expected to contribute. The classical-trajectory Monte Carlo method is employed to calculate doubly and singly differential cross sections for C$^{6+}$, O$^{8+}$ and Si$^{13+}$ projectiles, and comparisons with Continuum Distorted Wave Eikonal Initial State theoretical results and with experimental data are presented. We implement a time-dependent screening effect in our model, in the spirit of mean-field theory to investigate its effect for highly charged projectiles. We also focus on the role of an accurate description of the molecular target by means of a three-center potential to show its effect on differential cross sections. Very good agreement with experiments is found at medium to high electron emission energies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.