Paper detail

Classical OBe Stars as Post-Supernova Runaways: Confirming Binary Origins

Massive binaries play an important role in fields ranging from gravitational wave astronomy to stellar evolution. We provide several lines of evidence that classical OBe stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) obtain their rapid rotation from mass and angular momentum transfer in massive binaries, which predicts that the subsequent supernovae should often eject OBe stars into the field. We find that (1) OBe stars have a higher field frequency than OB stars; (2) our cumulative distribution function (CDF) of stellar distances from O stars shows that OBe stars are indeed much more isolated than ordinary OB stars of corresponding spectral types; (3) the CDFs of OBe stars approach that of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs), which are confirmed post-supernova objects; and (4) Oe stars are as isolated from clusters as Be stars, implying that their final masses are relatively independent of their initial masses, consistent with major mass transfer. Lastly, we also find that the spatial distribution of supergiant OBe stars differs from that of classical OBe stars, consistent with the different mechanism responsible for their emission-line spectra.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.