Paper detail

Classical field records of a quantum system: their internal consistency and accuracy

We determine the regime where the widespread classical field description for quantum Bose gases is quantitatively accurate in 1d, 2d, and 3d by a careful study of the ideal gas limit. Numerical benchmarking in 1d shows that the ideal gas results carry over unchanged into the weakly interacting gas. The optimum high energy cutoff is in general shown to depend strongly on the observable in question (e.g. energy, density fluctuations, phase coherence length, condensate fraction). This explains the wide spread of past results. A consistent classical field representation with less than 10% deviation in all typical observables can be given for systems at temperatures below 0.0064 degeneracy temperature in 1d, and 0.49 critical temperature in 3d. Surprisingly, this is not possible for the 2d ideal gas even at zero temperature because mean density, density fluctuations and energy cannot be simultaneously matched to the quantum results.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.