Paper detail

Class I and Class II methanol masers in high-mass star forming regions

Among the tracers of the earliest phases in the massive star formation process, methanol masers have gained increasing importance. The phenomenological distinction between Class I and II methanol masers is based on their spatial association with objects such as jets, cores, and ultracompact HII regions, but is also believed to correspond to different pumping mechanisms: radiation for Class II masers, collisions for Class I masers. In this work, we have surveyed a large sample of massive star forming regions - 296 objects divided into two groups named 'High' and 'Low' according to their [25-12] and [60-12] IRAS colours - in Class I and II methanol masers. Previous studies indicate that the High sources are likely more evolved. Therefore, the sample can be used to assess the existence of a sequence for the occurrence of Class I and II methanol masers during the evolution of a massive star forming region. We observed the 6 GHz (Class II) CH3OH maser with the Effelsberg 100-m telescope, and the 44 GHz and 95 GHz (Class I) CH3OH masers with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope. We have detected: 55 sources in the Class II line (12 new detections); 27 sources in the 44 GHz Class I line (17 new detections); 11 sources in the 95 GHz Class I line (all except one are new detections). Our statistical analysis shows that the ratio between the detection rates of Class II and Class I methanol masers is basically the same in High and Low sources. Therefore, both masers are equally associated with each evolutionary phase. In contrast, all maser species have about 3 times higher detection rates in High than in Low sources. This might indicate that the phenomena that originate all masers become progressively more active with time, during the earliest evolutionary phases of a high-mass star forming region.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.