Abstract

We investigate a possible correlation between the solid surface density ΣΣ of the minimum-mass extrasolar nebulae (MMEN) and the host star mass M⋆M_\star and metallicity [Fe/H]. Leveraging on the precise host star properties from the California-{\it Kepler}-Survey (CKS), we found that Σ=Σ= 50^{+33}_{-20} \rm{~g~cm}^{-2} (a/1AU)−1.75±0.07(a/1AU)^{-1.75\pm0.07} (M⋆/M⊙)1.04±0.22(M_\star/M_\odot)^{1.04\pm0.22} 100.22±0.05[Fe/H]10^{0.22\pm0.05{\rm [Fe/H]}} for {\it Kepler}-like systems (1-4R⊕R_\oplus; a<a<1AU). The strong M⋆M_\star dependence is reminiscent of previous dust continuum results that the solid disk mass scales with M⋆M_\star. The weaker [Fe/H] dependence shows that sub-Neptune planets, unlike giant planets, form readily in lower-metallicity environment. The innermost region (a<a< 0.1AU) of a MMEN maintains a smooth profile despite a steep decline of planet occurrence rate: a result that favors the truncation of disks by co-rotating magnetospheres with a range of rotation periods, rather than the sublimation of dusts. The ΣΣ of {\it Kepler} multi-transiting systems shows a much stronger correlation with M⋆M_\star and [Fe/H] than singles. This suggests that the dynamically hot evolution that produced single systems also partially removed the memory of formation in disks. Radial-velocity planets yielded a MMEN very similar to CKS planets; transit-timing-variation planets' postulated convergent migration history is supported by their poorly constrained MMEN. We found that lower-mass stars have a higher efficiency of forming/retaining planets: for sun-like stars about 20\% of the solid mass within ∼\sim1AU are converted/preserved as sub-Neptunes, compared to 70\% for late-K-early-M stars. This may be due to the lower binary fraction, lower giant-planet occurrence or the longer disk lifetime of lower-mass stars.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.