Paper detail

CKS IX: Revisiting the Minimum-Mass Extrasolar Nebula with Precise Stellar Parameters

We investigate a possible correlation between the solid surface density $Σ$ of the minimum-mass extrasolar nebulae (MMEN) and the host star mass $M_\star$ and metallicity [Fe/H]. Leveraging on the precise host star properties from the California-{\it Kepler}-Survey (CKS), we found that $Σ=$ 50^{+33}_{-20} \rm{~g~cm}^{-2} $(a/1AU)^{-1.75\pm0.07}$ $(M_\star/M_\odot)^{1.04\pm0.22}$ $10^{0.22\pm0.05{\rm [Fe/H]}}$ for {\it Kepler}-like systems (1-4$R_\oplus$; $a<$1AU). The strong $M_\star$ dependence is reminiscent of previous dust continuum results that the solid disk mass scales with $M_\star$. The weaker [Fe/H] dependence shows that sub-Neptune planets, unlike giant planets, form readily in lower-metallicity environment. The innermost region ($a<$ 0.1AU) of a MMEN maintains a smooth profile despite a steep decline of planet occurrence rate: a result that favors the truncation of disks by co-rotating magnetospheres with a range of rotation periods, rather than the sublimation of dusts. The $Σ$ of {\it Kepler} multi-transiting systems shows a much stronger correlation with $M_\star$ and [Fe/H] than singles. This suggests that the dynamically hot evolution that produced single systems also partially removed the memory of formation in disks. Radial-velocity planets yielded a MMEN very similar to CKS planets; transit-timing-variation planets&#39; postulated convergent migration history is supported by their poorly constrained MMEN. We found that lower-mass stars have a higher efficiency of forming/retaining planets: for sun-like stars about 20\% of the solid mass within $\sim$1AU are converted/preserved as sub-Neptunes, compared to 70\% for late-K-early-M stars. This may be due to the lower binary fraction, lower giant-planet occurrence or the longer disk lifetime of lower-mass stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.