Paper detail

Citations, Sequence Alignments, Contagion, and Semantics: On Acyclic Structures and their Randomness

Datasets from several domains, such as life-sciences, semantic web, machine learning, natural language processing, etc. are naturally structured as acyclic graphs. These datasets, particularly those in bio-informatics and computational epidemiology, have grown tremendously over the last decade or so. Increasingly, as a consequence, there is a need to build and evaluate various strategies for processing acyclic structured graphs. Most of the proposed research models the real world acyclic structures as random graphs, i.e., they are generated by randomly selecting a subset of edges from all possible edges. Unfortunately the graphs thus generated have predictable and degenerate structures, i.e., the resulting graphs will always have almost the same degree distribution and very short paths. Specifically, we show that if $O(n \log n \log n)$ edges are added to a binary tree of $n$ nodes then with probability more than $O(1/(\log n)^{1/n})$ the depth of all but $O({\log \log n} ^{\log \log n})$ vertices of the dag collapses to 1. Experiments show that irregularity, as measured by distribution of length of random walks from root to leaves, is also predictable and small. The degree distribution and random walk length properties of real world graphs from these domains are significantly different from random graphs of similar vertex and edge size.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.