Paper detail

Circumstellar shell and presupernova emission of SN 2020tlf

We address a phenomenon of a confined circumstellar (CS) dense shell and powerful presupernova emission of SN 2020tlf (type IIP). Modeling the \ha\ line and the circumstellar interaction implies the CS shell radius of $\sim$10$^{15}$ cm and the mass of $\sim0.2M_{\odot}$ lost during $\sim$6 yr prior to the explosion. Spectra and photometry of the supernova after the explosion do not show apparent signature of the material lost by the presupernova during its powerful luminosity. This material presumably resided in the inner zone of the CS shell. We present a hydrodynamic model of the outcome of a flash with the energy of $5\times10^{48}$ erg in the convective nuclear burning zone. The model predicts the ejection of outer layers of the presupernova ($\sim0.1M_{\odot}$) and the luminosity of $10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ during several hundreds days in accord with observations. We propose the Lighthill mechanism of acoustic waves generation by the turbulence of the convective nuclear burning zone to account for the phenomenon of a compact CS shell of supernovae related to the core collapse.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.