Paper detail

Circumstellar H-alpha from SN 1994D and future Type Ia supernovae: an observational test of progenitor models

Searching for the presence of circumstellar material is currently the only direct way to discriminate between the different types of possible progenitor systems for Type Ia supernovae. We have therefore looked for narrow H-alpha in a high-resolution spectrum of the normal Type Ia supernova 1994D taken 10 days before maximum and only 6.5 days after explosion. We derive an upper limit of 2.0E-16 erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} for an unresolved emission line at the local H II region velocity. To estimate the limit this puts on wind density, we have made time-dependent photoionization calculations. Assuming spherical symmetry we find an upper limit of the mass loss rate which is roughly 1.5E-5 solar masses per year for a wind speed of 10 km s^{-1}. This limit can exclude only the highest-mass-loss-rate symbiotic systems as progenitors. We discuss the effect of asymmetry and assess the relative merits of early optical, radio and X-ray limits in constraining mass loss from Type Ia progenitors. We find that X-ray observations can probably provide the most useful limits on the progenitor mass loss, while high-resolution optical spectroscopy offers our only chance of actually identifying circumstellar hydrogen.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.