Paper detail

Circuit diameter and Klee-Walkup constructions

Consider a variant of the graph diameter of a polyhedron where each step in a walk between two vertices travels maximally in a circuit direction instead of along incident edges. Here circuit directions are non-trivial solutions to minimally-dependent subsystems of the presentation of the polyhedron. These can be understood as the set of all possible edge directions, including edges that may arise from translation of the facets. It is appealing to consider a circuit analogue of the Hirsch conjecture for graph diameter, as suggested by Borgwardt et al. [BFH15]. They ask whether the known counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture give rise to counterexamples for this relaxed notion of circuit diameter. We show that the most basic counterexample to the unbounded Hirsch conjecture, the Klee-Walkup polyhedron, does have a circuit diameter that satisfies the Hirsch bound, regardless of representation. We also examine the circuit diameter of the bounded Klee-Walkup polytope.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.