Paper detail

Chirality of the gravitational-wave background and pulsar-timing arrays

We describe the signatures of a circularly polarized gravitational-wave background on the timing residuals obtained with pulsar-timing arrays. Most generally, the circular polarization will depend on the gravitational-wave direction, and we describe this angular dependence in terms of spherical harmonics. While the amplitude of the monopole (the overall chirality of the gravitational-wave background) cannot be detected, measures of the anisotropy are theoretically conceivable. We provide expressions for the minimum-variance estimators for the circular-polarization anisotropy. We evaluate the smallest detectable signal as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio with which the isotropic GW signal is detected and the number of pulsars (assumed to be roughly uniformly spread throughout the sky) in the survey. We find that the overall dipole of the circular polarization and a few higher overall multipoles, are detectable in a survey with $\gtrsim100$ pulsars if their amplitude is close to maximal and once the isotropic signal is established with a signal-to-noise ratio $\gtrsim400$. Even if the anisotropy can be established, though, there will be limited information on its direction. Similar arguments apply to astrometric searches for gravitational waves.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.