Paper detail

Chirality dependence of thermoelectric response in a thermal QCD medium

The lifting of the degeneracy between L- and R-modes of massless flavors in a weakly magnetized thermal QCD medium leads to a novel phenomenon of chirality dependence of the thermoelectric tensor, whose diagonal and non-diagonal elements are the Seebeck and Hall-type Nernst coefficient, respectively. Both coefficients in L-mode have been found to be greater than their counterparts in R-mode, however the disparity is more pronounced in the Nernst coefficient. Another noteworthy observation is the impact of the dimensionality of temperature (T) profile on the Seebeck coefficient, wherein we find that the coefficient magnitude is significantly enhanced (one order of magnitude) in the 2-D setup, compared to a 1-D T profile. Further, the chiral dependent quasifermion masses constrain the range of magnetic field (B) and T in a manner so as to enforce the weak magnetic field (eB << T^2 ) condition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.