Paper detail

Chiral limits and effect of light on the Hofstadter butterfly in twisted bilayer graphene

We study the magnetic field induced Hofstadter butterfly in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) in various kinds of situations. First, we study the equilibrium case and identify the interlayer hopping processes that are most crucial for the appearance of a Hofstadter butterfly. Surprisingly, the hopping processes that are important for the appearance of the Hofstadter butterfly can be categorized as AA stacking type - that is interlayer hoppings between equivalent sublattices. This is in contrast to AB/BA-type hoppings that are important for the appearance of flat bands in magic angle TBG and were discussed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019)]. We also find that if AB-type interlayer-hopping processes are turned off the resulting model is chiral but differs from the model discussed in \cite{Tarnopolsky}. Therefore, TBG has two separate chiral limits - one of them is important to understand the formation of flat bands and the other for the Hofstadter butterfly. Taking this as motivation we discuss how the role of AA-type hoppings in combination with lattice relaxation effects can make individual Landau levels slightly harder to resolve in an experimental setting than one would expect from a non-relaxed lattice setting. Finally, we consider the impact of different forms of light on the fractal structure of the butterfly. Particularly, we study the impact of circularly polarized light and longitudinal light originating from a waveguide. As the system is exposed to circularly polarized light we find butterflies with increasingly pronounced asymmetry with respect to energy $E=0$. This is due to the introduction of a gap term that breaks the chiral symmetries for both of the two chiral limits mentioned above. Lastly, we study the effect of longitudinal light that can be produced at the exit of a waveguide, in a slightly simplified model. Here, we find ...

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.