Paper detail

Chemistry in Disks. V: CN and HCN in proto-planetary disks

The chemistry of proto-planetary disks is thought to be dominated by two major processes: photodissociation near the disk surface, and depletion on dust grains in the disk mid-plane, resulting in a layered structure with molecules located in a warm layer above the disk mid-plane. We attempt here to confront this warm molecular layer model prediction with the distribution of two key molecules for dissociation processes: CN and HCN. Using the IRAM Plateau de Bure interferometer, we obtained high spatial and spectral resolution images of the CN J=2-1 and HCN J=1-0 lines in the disks surrounding the two T-Tauri DM Tau and LkCa 15 and the Herbig Ae MWC 480. Disk properties are derived assuming power law distributions. The hyperfine structure of the observed transitions allows us to constrain the line opacities and excitation temperatures. We compare the observational results with predictions from existing chemical models, and use a simple PDR model (without freeze-out of molecules on grains and surface chemistry) to illustrate dependencies on UV field strength, grain size and gas-to-dust ratio. We also evaluate the impact of Lyman alpha radiation. The temperature ordering follows the trend found from CO lines, with DM Tau being the coldest object and MWC 480 the warmest. Although CN indicates somewhat higher excitation temperatures than HCN, the derived values in the T-Tauri disks are very low (8-10 K). They agree with results obtained from CCH, and are in contradiction with thermal and chemical model predictions. These very low temperatures, as well as geometrical constraints, suggest that substantial amounts of CN and HCN remain in the gas phase close to the disk mid-plane, and that this mid-plane is quite cold. The observed CN/HCN ratio (5-10) is in better agreement with the existence of large grains, and possibly also a substantial contribution of Lyman alpha radiation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.