Chemistry in Cosmic-Ray Dominated Regions (CRDRs)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

Molecular line observations may serve as diagnostics of the degree to which the number density of cosmic ray protons, having energies of 10s to 100s of MeVs each, is enhanced in starburst galaxies and galaxies with active nuclei. Results, obtained with the UCL\_PDR code, for the fractional abundances of molecules as functions of the cosmic-ray induced ionisation rate, ζζ, are presented. The aim is not to model any particular external galaxies. Rather, it is to identify characteristics of the dependencies of molecular abundances on ζζ, in part to enable the development of suitable observational programmes for cosmic ray dominated regions (CRDRs) which will then stimulate detailed modelling. For a number density of hydrogen nuclei of of 10410^4 cm−3^{-3}, and high visual extinction, the fractional abundances of some species increase as ζζ increases to 10−1410^{-14} s−1^{-1}, but for much higher values of ζζ the fractional abundances of all molecular species are significantly below their peak values. We show in particular that OH, H2_{2}O, H3+_{3}^{+}, H3_{3}O+^{+} and OH+^{+} attain large fractional abundances (⩾10−8\geqslant 10^{-8}) for ζζ as large as 10−1210^{-12} s−1^{-1}. HCO+^{+} is a poor tracer of CRDRs when ζ>10−13ζ> 10^{-13} s−1^{-1}. Sulphur-bearing species may be useful tracers of CRDRs gas in which ζ∼10−16ζ\sim 10^{-16} s−1^{-1}. Ammonia has a large fractional abundance for ζ⩽10−16ζ\leqslant 10^{-16} s−1^{-1} and nitrogen appears in CN-bearing species at significant levels as ζζ increases, even up to ∼10−14\sim 10^{-14} s−1^{-1}. In this paper, we also discuss our model predictions, comparing them to recent detections in both galactic and extragalactic sources. We show that they agree well, to a first approximation, with the observational constraints.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.