Paper detail

Chemically-adhesive particles form stronger and stiffer magnetorheological fluids

Magnetorheological fluids (MRF) are suspensions of magnetic particles that solidify in the presence of magnetic fields due to the particles forming chains along field lines. The magnetic forces between particles dominate the solidification process and determine the yield stress of the material. Here, we investigate how reversible chemical links between particles influence MRF yield stress and stiffness through rheological testing in flow and oscillation mode. First, we functionalize particles with phosphonate groups that are expected to link through hydrogen bonding and find that this MRF exhibits up to 40% higher yield stress and 100% higher stiffness than an MRF composed of unfunctionalized particles. To explain this, we model the chemical attraction as an adhesion that supplements dipole-dipole interactions between particles. Interestingly, we find that the increase in yield stress is largest for dilute suspensions that are expected to solidify into isolated chains, while the proportional increase in yield stress is less for MRF with higher concentrations. This is explained by the higher concentration MRF forming a body-centered tetragonal (BCT) lattice in which interparticle adhesion forces are no longer aligned with the field. To explore the possibility of dynamically tuning interparticle interactions, we functionalize particles with polystyrene polymers with thymine terminal groups that will only exhibit interparticle hydrogen bonding in the presence of a linking molecule, namely melamine. We find that MRF formed with these particles also exhibit up to a 40% increase in yield stress and ~100% increase in stiffness, but only in the presence of melamine. In addition to confirming the role of hydrogen bonding in increasing MRF performance, these results highlight the possibility of dynamically tuning MRF performance using magnetic fields and chemical modifications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.