Paper detail

Chemical tagging of the Ursa Major moving group: A northern selection of FGK stars

Stellar kinematic groups are kinematical coherent groups of stars which might share a common origin.These groups spread through the Galaxy over time due to tidal effects caused by Galactic rotation and disc heating.However, the chemical information survives these processes. The information provided by the analysis of chemical elements can reveal the origin of these kinematic groups. Here we investigate the origin of the stars that belong to the Ursa Major Moving Group. We present high-resolution spectroscopic observations obtained from three different spectrographs of kinematically selected FGK stars of the Ursa Major moving group. Stellar atmospheric parameters (Teff, log(g), xi, and [Fe/H]) were determined using our own automatic code (StePar) which makes use of the sensitivity of iron equivalent widths measured in the spectra. We critically compare the StePar results with other methods (Teff values derived using the infrared flux method and log(g) values based on Hipparcos parallaxes). We derived the chemical abundances of 20 elements, and their [X/Fe] ratios of all stars in the sample. We perform a differential abundance analysis with respect to a reference star of the UMa MG (HD115043). We have also carried out a systematic comparison of the abundance pattern of the Ursa Major MG and the Hyades SC with the thin disc stellar abundances. Our chemical tagging analysis indicates that the Ursa Major MG is less affected by field star contamination than other moving groups (such as the Hyades SC). We find a roughly solar iron composition for the finally selected stars, whereas the [X/Fe] ratios are roughly sub-solar except for super-solar Barium abundance.We conclude that 29 out of 44 (i.e. 66 %) candidate stars share a similar chemical composition. In addition, we find that the abundance pattern of the Ursa Major MG might be marginally different from that of the Hyades SC.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.