Paper detail

Chemical tagging and the second r-process

Elements in the range 37 < Z < 47 provide key information on their formation process. Several studies have shown that some of these elements are formed by an r-process, that differs from the main r-process creating europium. Through a detailed abundance study of Rb - Ag I will show, by comparing these abundances to those of Ba and Eu, that their formation processes differ. The formation process of Pd and Ag deviates from the weak/main s-process as well as from the main r-process. Hence, Pd and Ag - and to some extend Zr - are created by a second/weak r-process. However, the characteristics and formation site of this process is not well understood. The abundance ratios of Rb/Zr help constrain the neutron number density of the formation site, while comparing the Pd and Ag abundances to yield predictions can provide limitations on the entropy and electron fraction of the formation environment. This study presents clues on the second r-process. Furthermore, the formation processes of the heavy elements might not differ in a clear cut way. Several of these neutron-capture processes might yield various amounts of heavy elements (e.g. Sr and Ba) at the same time or metallicity. This could possibly help explain the large star-to-star abundance scatter for these two elements below [Fe/H]= -2.5. Knowing their origin is important in the era of large surveys (e.g Gaia-ESO). Strontium and barium will, limited by resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, be the only detectable heavy elements in the most metal-poor stars. Hence, they will, depending on metallicity, be the main tracers of the weak and main s-/r-processes. Understanding the effects of stellar parameters, synthetic spectrum codes, model atmospheres, and NLTE on the Sr abundances are crucial to describe the chemical evolution of our Galaxy. I will present these effects for Sr.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.