Paper detail

Chemical evolution of the Universe and its consequences for gravitational-wave astrophysics

We are now routinely detecting gravitational waves (GW) emitted by merging black holes and neutron stars. Those are the afterlives of massive stars that formed all across the Universe - at different times and with different metallicities (abundances of elements heavier than helium). Birth metallicity plays an important role in the evolution of massive stars. Consequently, the population properties of mergers are sensitive to the metallicity dependent cosmic star formation history (f$_{\rm SFR}$(Z,z)). In particular, within the isolated formation scenarios (the focus of this paper), a strong low metallicity preference of the formation of mergers involving black holes was found. The origin of this dependence and its consequences are discussed. Most importantly, uncertainty in the f$_{\rm SFR}$(Z,z) (substantial even at low redshifts, especially at low metallicity) cannot be ignored in the models and makes the interpretation of current GW observations challenging. Possible paths for imporvements and the role of future GW detectors are considered. Recent efforts to determine f$_{\rm SFR}$(Z,z) and the factors that dominate its uncertainty are summarized. Many of those factors are related to the properties of galaxies that are faint and distant and therefore difficult to observe. The fact that they leave imprint on the properties of mergers as a function of cosmic time makes future GW observations a promising (and complementary to electromagnetic observations) tool to study chemical evolution of galaxies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.