Paper detail

Chemical Evolution of the Galaxy: the G-dwarf problem and radioactive chronology revisited taking account of the Thick Disk

Thin and Thick disk metallicities overlap, but alpha(Fe) relations differ; there is also a hiatus in time before the first thin-disk stars, with a minimum metallicity [Fe/H] = -0.6. Thus there are two `G-dwarf' problems. We fit metallicity distribution functions (MDFs) for the two disks derived by Wyse & Gilmore (1995) with analytical models (for O and Mg). The Thick disk fits a simple inflow model with effective yield and final [Mg/H] about the same as for the Thin Disk, excluding continuous mass loss from the former as a source of prompt initial enrichment (PIE) for the latter. The Thin disk has a narrow MDF fitted (rather poorly) with a closed model having PIE from some other source, or more elegantly with a slow infall model similar to the `two-inflow' scenario of Matteucci et al., but with a PIE and a severe break in the age-metallicity relation. Implications for radio-active cosmochronology are investigated.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.