Paper detail

Chemical Evolution of Dwarf Irregular and Blue Compact Galaxies

Dwarf irregular and blue compact galaxies are very interesting objects since they are relatively simple and unevolved. We present new models for the chemical evolution of these galaxies by assuming different regimes of star formation (bursting and continuous) and different kinds of galactic winds (normal and metal-enhanced). Our results show that in order to reproduce all the properties of these galaxies, including the spread in the chemical abundances, the star formation should have proceeded in bursts and the number of bursts should be not larger than 10 in each galaxy, and that metal-enhanced galactic winds are required. A metal-enhanced wind efficiency increasing with galactic mass can by itself reproduce the observed mass-metallicity relation although also an increasing efficiency of star formation and/or number and/or duration of bursts can equally well reproduce such a relation. Metal enhanced winds together with an increasing amount of star formation with galactic mass are required to explain most of the properties of these galaxies. Normal galactic winds, where all the gas is lost at the same rate, do not reproduce the features of these galaxies. We suggest that these galaxies should have suffered a different number of bursts varying from 2 to 10 and that the efficiency of metal-enhanced winds should have been not too high ($λ_{mw}\sim1$). We predict for these galaxies present time Type Ia SN rates from 0.00084 and 0.0023 per century. Finally, by comparing the abundance patterns of Damped Lyman-$α$ objects with our models we conclude that they are very likely the progenitors of the present day dwarf irregulars. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.