Paper detail

Chemical equilibrium in AGB atmospheres: Successes, failures, and prospects for small molecules, clusters, and condensates

Chemical equilibrium has proven extremely useful to predict the chemical composition of AGB atmospheres. Here we use a recently developed code and an updated thermochemical database, including gaseous and condensed species involving 34 elements, to compute the chemical equilibrium composition of AGB atmospheres of M-, S-, and C-type stars. We include for the first time TixCy clusters, with x = 1-4 and y = 1-4, and selected larger clusters ranging up to Ti13C22, for which thermochemical data is obtained from quantum chemical calculations. We find that in general chemical equilibrium reproduces well the observed abundances of parent molecules in circumstellar envelopes of AGB stars. There are however severe discrepancies, of various orders of magnitude, for some parent molecules: HCN, CS, NH3, and SO2 in M-type stars, H2O and NH3 in S-type stars, and the hydrides H2O, NH3, SiH4, and PH3 in C-type stars. Several molecules not yet observed in AGB atmospheres, like SiC5, SiNH, SiCl, PS, HBO, and the metal-containing molecules MgS, CaS, CaOH, CaCl, CaF, ScO, ZrO, VO, FeS, CoH, and NiS, are good candidates for detection with observatories like ALMA. The first condensates predicted are carbon, TiC, and SiC in C-rich atmospheres and Al2O3 in O-rich outflows. The most probable gas-phase precursors of dust are acetylene, atomic carbon, and/or C3 for carbon dust, SiC2 and Si2C for SiC dust, and atomic Al and AlOH, AlO, and Al2O for Al2O3 dust. In the case of TiC dust, atomic Ti is probably the main supplier of titanium. However, chemical equilibrium predicts that clusters like Ti8C12 and Ti13C22 become the major reservoirs of titanium at the expense of atomic Ti in the region where condensation of TiC is expected to occur, suggesting that the assembly of large TixCy clusters could be related to the formation of the first condensation nuclei of TiC.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.