Paper detail

Chemical equilibrium between Cores, Mantles, and Atmospheres of Super-Earths and Sub-Neptunes, and Implications for their Compositions, Interiors and Evolution

We investigate equilibrium chemistry between molten metal and silicate, and a hydrogen-rich envelope using 18 independent reactions among 25 phase components for sub-Neptune-like exoplanets. Both reactive metal and unreactive metal sequestered in an isolated core are modeled. The overarching effects of equilibration are oxidation of the envelope and reduction of the mantle and core. Hydrogen and oxygen typically comprise significant fractions of metal cores at chemical equilibrium, leading to density deficits that offer a possible alternative explanation for the low densities of the Trappist-1 planets. Reactions with the magma ocean produce significant amounts of SiO and H$_2$O in the envelopes directly above the magma ocean. Molar concentrations in the envelopes of planets with reactive metal are H$_2>\rm{SiO}>CO\sim\rm{Na}\sim\rm{Mg}>\rm{H}_2\rm{O}>>\rm{CO}_2\sim\rm{CH}_4>>\rm{O}_2$ while for the unreactive metal case H$_2$O becomes the second most abundant species, after H$_2$, providing an arbiter for the two scenarios amenable to observation. The water abundances in the atmospheres exceed those in the mantles by at least an order of magnitude in both scenarios. The water concentrations in the silicate mantles are $\sim 0.01$ wt\% and $\sim 0.1$ wt\% in the reactive and unreactive metal core cases, respectively, limiting the H$_2$O that might be outgassed in a future super-Earth. Less dissolved water in the reactive core case is due to sequestration of H and O in the Fe-rich metal. The total hydrogen budget of most sub-Neptunes can be, to first order, estimated from their atmospheres alone, as the atmospheres typically contain more than 90\% of all H.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.