Paper detail

Chemical constraints on the contribution of Population III stars to cosmic reionization

Recent studies have highlighted that galaxies at z = 6-8 fall short of producing enough ionizing photons to reionize the IGM, and suggest that Population III stars could resolve this tension, because their harder spectra can produce ~10x more ionizing photons than Population II. But this argument depends critically on the duration of the Population III era, and because Population III stars form from pristine gas, in turn depends on the rate of galactic enrichment. We use a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation which tracks galactic chemical evolution, to gauge the impact of Population III stars on reionization. Population III SNe produce distinct metal abundances, and we argue that the duration of the Population III era can be constrained by precise relative abundance measurements in high-z damped Lyα absorbers (DLAs), which provide a chemical record of past star-formation. We find that a single generation of Population III stars can self-enrich galaxies above the critical metallicity Zcrit=10^-4 Zsun for the Population III-to-II transition, on a very short timescale of ~10^6 yr, owing to the large metal yields and short lifetimes of Population III stars. This subsequently terminates the Population III era, hence they contribute >~ 50% of the ionizing photons only for z >~ 30, and at z=10 contribute <1%. The Population III contribution can be increased by delaying metal mixing into the ISM. However comparing the resulting metal abundance pattern to existing measurements in z <~ 6 DLAs, we show that the fractional contribution of high-mass Population III stars to the ionization rate must be <~ 10% at z = 10. Future abundance measurements of z~7-8 QSOs and GRBs should probe the era when the chemical vestiges of Population III star formation become detectable.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.