Paper detail

Chemical compositions and kinematics of the Hercules stream

An abundance analysis is reported of 58 K giants identified by Famaey et al. (2005) as highly probable members of the Hercules stream selected from stars north of the celestial equator in the Hipparcos catalogue. The giants have compositions spanning the interval [Fe/H] from $-$0.17 to $+$0.42 with a mean value of $+$0.15 and relative elemental abundances [El/Fe] representative of the Galactic thin disc. Selection effects may have biassed the selection from the Hipparcos catalogue against the selection of metal-poor stars. Our reconsideration of the recent extensive survey of FG dwarfs which included metal-poor stars (Bensby et al. 2014) provides a [Fe/H] distribution for the Hercules stream which is similar to that from the 58 giants. It appears that the stream is dominated by metal-rich stars from the thin disc. Suggestions in the literature that the stream includes metal-poor stars from the thick disc are discussed.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.