Paper detail

Chemical Cartography. II. The Assembly History of the Galactic Stellar Halo Traced by Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor Stars

We present an analysis of the kinematic properties of stellar populations in the Galactic halo, making use of over 100,000 main sequence turnoff (MSTO) stars observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. After dividing the Galactic halo into an inner-halo region (IHR) and outer-halo region (OHR), based on the spatial variation of carbon-to-iron ratios in the sample, we find that stars in the OHR exhibit a clear retrograde motion of $-$49 $\pm$ 4 km s$^{-1}$ and a more spherical distribution of stellar orbits, while stars in the IHR have zero net rotation ($-$3 $\pm$ 1 km s$^{-1}$) with a much more radially biased distribution of stellar orbits. Furthermore, we classify the carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars among the MSTO sample in each halo component into CEMP-no and CEMP-$s$ sub-classes, based on their absolute carbon abundances, $A$(C), and examine the spatial distributions and kinematics associated with each sub-class. The CEMP-no stars are the majority sub-class of CEMP stars in the OHR ($\sim$ 65%), and the minority sub-class in the IHR ($\sim$ 44%), similar to the results of several previous analyses. The CEMP-no stars in each halo region exhibit slightly higher counter-rotation than the CEMP-$s$ stars, but within statistical errors. The CEMP-no stars also show a more spherical distribution of orbits than the CEMP-$s$ stars in each halo region. These distinct characteristics provide strong evidence that numerous low-mass satellite galaxies (similar to the ultra-faint dwarf galaxies) have donated stars to the OHR, while more-massive dwarf galaxies provided the dominant contribution to the IHR.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.