Paper detail

Chemical abundances of the PRGs UGC7576 and UGC9796. I. Testing the formation scenario

The study of the chemical abundances of HII regions in polar ring galaxies and their implications for the evolutionary scenario of these systems has been a step forward both in tracing the formation history of the galaxy and giving hints on the mechanisms at work during the building of disk by cold accretion process. It's now important to establish whether such results are typical for the class of polar disk galaxies as whole. The present work aims at checking the cold accretion of gas through a "cosmic filament" as a possible scenario for the formation of the polar structures in UGC7576 and UGC9796. If these form by cold accretion, we expect the HII regions abundances and metallicities to be lower than those of same-luminosity spiral disks, with values of the order of Z ~ 1/10 Zsun, as predicted by cosmological simulations. We have used deep long-slit spectra, obtained with DOLORES@TNG in the optical wavelengths, of the brightest HII regions associated with the polar structures to derive their chemical abundances and star formation rate. We used the "Empirical methods", based on the intensities of easily observable lines, to derive the oxygen abundance 12+log(O/H) of both galaxies. Such values are compared with those typical for different morphological galaxy types of comparable luminosity. The average metallicity values for UGC7576 and UGC9796 are Z = 0.4 Zsun and Z = 0.1 Zsun respectively. Both values are lower than those measured for ordinary spirals of similar luminosity and UGC7576 presents no metallicity gradient along the polar structure. These data, toghether with other observed features, available for the two PRGs in previous works, are compared with the predictions of simulations of tidal accretion, cold accretion and merging, to disentangle between these scenarios.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.