Paper detail

Chemical abundances of 1111 FGK stars from the HARPS-GTO planet search sample. III. Sulfur

Context. Elemental abundances are of prime importance to help us reconstruct the origin and evolution of stars and galaxies in our Universe. Sulfur abundances have not been as heavily studied as other elements, so some details regarding its behaviour are still unclear. Aims. We aim to investigate [S/Fe] ratios in stars of the solar neighbourhood in order to analyse the chemical evolution of sulfur and probe for possible differences in abundances of planet host and non-planet host stars. Methods. We use the code MOOG to perform spectral synthesis and derive v*sin(i) values and [S/Fe] ratios for 719 FGK stars with high-resolution (R~115000) and high-quality spectra from the HARPS-GTO program. We find the best fit and corresponding parameter values by performing chi-square minimisation of the deviation between synthetic profiles and observational spectra. Results. Our results reveal that sulfur behaves as a typical alpha-element, with low abundances in young thin disk stars and high abundances in old thick disk stars, following what was expected from our understanding of the Galactic chemical evolution (GCE). Nevertheless, further studies into the abundances of sulfur in very metal-poor stars are required as our sample only derived sulfur abundances to stars with metallicity as low as [Fe/H]=-1.13 dex. High-alpha metal rich stars are more enhanced in sulfur compared to their thin disk counterparts at the same metallicity. We compare our results to GCE models from other authors in the [S/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] plane. The [S/Fe]-age relationship is a good proxy for time, just like it is the case with other alpha-elements. We report no differences in the abundances of sulfur between stars with and without planetary companions in the metallicity range [Fe/H] >= -0.3 dex.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.