Paper detail

Chemical abundances in Orion protoplanetary discs: integral field spectroscopy and photoevaporation models of HST 10

Photoevaporating protoplanetary discs (proplyds) in the vicinity of hot massive stars, such as those found in Orion, are important objects of study for the fields of star formation, early disc evolution, planetary formation, and H II region astrophysics. Their element abundances are largely unknown, unlike those of the main-sequence stars or the host Orion nebula. We present a spectroscopic analysis of the Orion proplyd HST 10, based on integral field observations with the Very Large Telescope/FLAMES fibre array with 0.31" x 0.31" spatial pixels. The proplyd and its vicinity are imaged in a variety of emission lines across a 6.8" x 4.3" area. The reddening, electron density and temperature are mapped out from various line diagnostics. The abundances of helium, and eight heavy elements are measured relative to hydrogen using the direct method based on the [O III] electron temperature. The abundance ratios of O/H and S/H are derived without resort to ionization correction factors. We construct dynamic photoevaporation models of HST 10 with the Cloudy microphysics code that validate the oxygen and sulfur abundances. With the exception of [O I] 6300-A and [S II] 4069-A, the model fit is satisfactory for all spectral lines arising from the proplyd. The models show that the classic ionization correction factor for neon significantly underestimates (0.4 dex) this element's abundance in the low ionization conditions of HST 10. Apart from iron, whose gas-phase abundance is ~0.3 dex lower than in the local Orion nebula, most other elements in the proplyd do not show substantially different gas-phase abundances from the nebula. The abundances of carbon, oxygen and neon in HST 10 are practically the same as those in B-type stars in Orion.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.