Paper detail

Chemical abundances in metal-poor giants: limitations imposed by the use of classical 1D stellar atmosphere models

In this work we have used 3D hydrodynamical (CO5BOLD) and 1D hydrostatic (LHD) stellar atmosphere models to study the importance of convection and horizontal temperature inhomogeneities in stellar abundance work related to late-type giants. We have found that for a number of key elements, such as Na, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti, Fe, Ni, Zn, Ba, Eu, differences in abundances predicted by 3D and 1D models are typically minor (< 0.1 dex) at solar metallicity. However, at [M/H] = -3 they become larger and reach to -0.5...-0.8 dex. In case of neutral atoms and fixed metallicity, the largest abundance differences were obtained for the spectral lines with lowest excitation potential, while for ionized species the largest 3D-1D abundance differences were found for lines of highest excitation potential. The large abundance differences at low metallicity are caused by large horizontal temperature fluctuations and lower mean temperature in the outer layers of the 3D hydrodynamical model compared with its 1D counterpart.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.