Paper detail

Chemical abundances for A-and F-type supergiant stars

We present the stellar parameters and elemental abundances of a set of A--F-type supergiant stars HD\,45674, HD\,180028, HD\,194951 and HD\,224893 using high resolution ($R$\,$\sim$\,42,000) spectra taken from ELODIE library. We present the first results of the abundance analysis for HD\,45674 and HD\,224893. We reaffirm the abundances for HD\,180028 and HD\,194951 studied previously by Luck (2014) respectively. Alpha-elements indicates that objects belong to the thin disc population. From their abundances and its location on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram seems point out that HD\,45675, HD\,194951 and HD\,224893 are in the post-first dredge-up (post-1DUP) phase and they are moving in the red-blue loop region. HD~180028, on the contary, shows typical abundances of the population I but its evolutionary status could not be satisfactorily defined.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.