Paper detail

Chemical Abundance Evidence of Enduring High Star Formation Rates in an Early Type Galaxy: High [Ca/Fe] in NGC 5128 Globular Clusters

We present [Fe/H], ages, and Ca abundances for an initial sample of 10 globular clusters in NGC 5128 obtained from high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio echelle spectra of their integrated light. All abundances and ages are obtained using our original technique for high resolution integrated light abundance analysis of globular clusters. The clusters have a range in [Fe/H] between -1.6 to -0.2. In this sample, the average [Ca/Fe] for clusters with [Fe/H]<-0.4 is +0.37$\pm$0.07, while the average [Ca/Fe] in our MW and M31 GC samples is +0.29 $\pm$0.09 and +0.24 $\pm$0.10, respectively. This may imply a more rapid chemical enrichment history for NGC 5128 than for either the Milky Way or M31.This sample provides the first quantitative picture of the chemical history of NGC 5128 that is directly comparable to what is available for the Milky Way. Data presented here were obtained with the MIKE echelle spectrograph on the Magellan Clay Telescope.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.