Paper detail

Chelyabinsk : a rock with many different (stony) faces: An infrared study

In order to provide spectral ground truth data for remote sensing applications, we have measured midinfrared spectra (2 to 18 micron) of three typical, well defined lithologies from the Chelyabinsk meteorite. These lithologies are classified as (a) moderately shocked, light lithology, (b) shock darkened lithology, and (c) impact melt lithology. Analyses were made from bulk material in four size fractions (0 to 25 micron, 25 to 63 micron, 63 to 125 micron, and 125 to 250 micron), and from additional thin sections. Characteristic infrared features in the powdered bulk material of the moderately shocked, light lithology, dominated by olivine, pyroxene and feldspathic glass, are a Christiansen feature (CF) between 8.5 and 8.8 micron; a transparency feature (TF) in the finest size fraction at about 13 micron, and strong reststrahlen bands (RB) at about 9.1 micron, 9.5 micron, 10.3 micron, 10.8 micron, 11.2 to 11.3 micron, 12 micron, and between 16 and 17 micron. The ranges of spectral features for the micro FTIR spots show a wider range than those obtained in diffuse reflectance, but are generally similar. With increasing influence of impact shock from pristine LL5 (or LL6) material (which have a low or moderate degree of shock) to the shock-darkened lithology and the impact melt lithology as endmembers, we observe the fading or disappearing of spectral features. Most prominent is the loss of a twin peak feature between 10.8 and 11.3 micron, which turns into a single peak. In addition, in the pure impact melt endmember lithology features at about 9.6 micron and about 9.1 micron are also lost. These losses are most likely correlated with decreasing amounts of crystal structure as the degree of shock melting increases.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.