Paper detail

Chebyshev's Bias against Splitting and Principal Primes in Global Fields

Reasons for the emergence of Chebyshev's bias were investigated. The Deep Riemann Hypothesis (DRH) enables us to reveal that the bias is a natural phenomenon for achieving a well-balanced disposition of the whole sequence of primes, in the sense that the Euler product converges at the center. By means of a weighted counting function of primes, the authors succeed in expressing magnitudes of the deflection by a certain asymptotic formula under the assumption of DRH, which provides a new formulation of Chebyshev's bias. For any Galois extension of global fields and for any element $σ$ in the Galois group, we have established a criterion of the bias of primes whose Frobenius elements are equal to $σ$ under the assumption of DRH. As an application we have obtained a bias toward non-splitting and non-principle primes in abelian extensions under DRH. In positive characteristic cases, DRH is known, and all these results hold unconditionally.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.