Paper detail

Chasing New Physics in Stacks of Soft Tracks

In this letter we introduce a new variable $ξ$, namely the number of tracks associated with the primary vertex, which are not parts of reconstructed objects such as jets/isolated leptons etc. We demonstrate its usefulness in the context of new physics searches in the channel monojet$+$missing transverse momentum (MET). In models such as in compressed supersymmetry, events are often characterized by a rather large number of soft partons from the cascade decays, none of which result in reconstructed objects. We find that $ξ$, binned in $p_T$, can discriminate these new physics events from events due to $Z+\text{jets}$, that is, the main background in the channel monojet+ MET. The information contained in soft tracks is largely uncorrelated with traditional variables such as the effective mass, MET, $p_T$ of the jet, etc. and, therefore, can be combined with these to increase the discovery potential by more than $200\%$ (depending on the spectra, of course). In fact, we find that simple cuts on $ξ(p_T)$ along with cuts on MET, and the effective mass outperforms sophisticated optimized MultiVariate Analyses using all conventional variables. One can model the background distribution of $ξ(p_T)$ in an entirely data-driven way, and make these robust against pile-up by identifying the primary vertex.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.