Paper detail

Charles Babbage, Ada Lovelace, and the Bernoulli Numbers

This chapter makes needed corrections to an unduly negative scholarly view of Ada Lovelace. Credit between Lovelace and Babbage is not a zero-sum game, where any credit added to Lovelace somehow detracts from Babbage. Ample evidence indicates Babbage and Lovelace each had important contributions to the famous 1843 Sketch of Babbage's Analytical Engine and the accompanying Notes. Further, Lovelace's correspondence with two highly accomplished figures in 19th century mathematics, Charles Babbage and Augustus De Morgan, establish her mathematical background and sophistication. Babbage and Lovelace's treatment of the Bernoulli numbers in Note 'G' spotlights this aspect of their collaboration. Finally, while acknowledging significant definitional problems in calling Lovelace the world's "first computer programmer," I affirm that Lovelace created an elemental sequence of instructions -- that is, an algorithm -- for computing the series of Bernoulli numbers.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.