Paper detail

Charging in the vortex lattice of type-II superconductors

We study the magnetic-field dependence of the vortex-core charge in the Abrikosov lattice of an $s$-wave superconductor based on the augmented quasiclassical equations, where we incorporate the pair-potential gradient (PPG) terms characteristic of charging in superconductors besides the well-known Lorentz force. Our numerical results at $T=0.2 T_{\rm c}$ and $0.5 T_{\rm c}$ reveal that periodic charge redistribution is superimposed on the magnetic flux-line lattice with different spatial patterns at different fields. The PPG terms are dominant at weak fields over the Lorentz force for accumulating charge in the vortex cores, whereas the Lorentz force prevails at higher fields to give rise to a peak structure in the core charge around $H\sim \frac{1}{2}H_{{\rm c}2}$. We estimate the peak value of the core charge at $T=0.2 T_{\rm c}$ using parameters appropriate for cuprates to obtain a large value of $Q \sim 10^{-2} |e|$ in the core region of radius $0.2 ξ_0$ in the $ab$ plane and length $1 \ {\rm nm}$ along the $c$ axis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.