Paper detail

Charged-particle multiplicity dependence of charm-baryon-to-meson ratio in high-energy proton-proton collisions

We propose that the charged-particle multiplicity dependence of the charm-baryon-to-meson ratio observed in high-energy $pp$ collisions can be explained by canonical treatment of quantum charges in the statistical hadronization model (SHM). Taking the full particle listings of PDG complemented by additional charm-baryon states from relativistic quark model predictions, we evaluate the canonical partition function and the charm-hadron chemical factors that measure the canonical suppression arising from the requirement of strict conservation of quantum charges. We demonstrate that, while charm number conservation induces common suppression on the production of both charm-baryons and -mesons, baryon (strangeness) number conservation causes further suppression on charm-baryons (charm-strange mesons) relative to nonstrange charm-mesons, thereby resulting in a decreasing $Λ_c/D^0$ ($D_s/D^0$) ratio toward smaller multiplicity events. The charm-hadron thermal densities thus computed are then used as pertinent weights to perform charm-quark fragmentation simulations yielding $p_T$-dependent $Λ_c/D^0$ and $D_s/D^0$ ratios at varying multiplicities in fair agreement with ALICE measurements.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.